According to Cohen, the so-called self-proclaimed ‘fixer’ of Trump, he has averted a major “biblical-level sex scandal” of the century. Unfortunately, he does not realize that all signs show that Stormy Daniels’ story is a figment of her imagination with a major loophole. And evidence shows Trump never had sex with her!
Ms Hicks said that while Cohen was not involved in the campaign directly, he frequently tried to inject himself into it. “He liked to call himself ‘Fixer’ or ‘Mr. Fix it,'” Hicks said. “And it was only because he first broke it.”
BBC
Hicks says Cohen would create a problem where there was none in the first place and fix it, taking credit as Mr. Fixer.
The term “biblical-level sex scandal” is not a standard phrase, but it seems to be a hyperbolic expression used to describe a sex scandal of enormous proportions or significance. The term “biblical level” is often used to refer to events or situations that are so significant that they could be compared to the epic events, stories, or lessons found in the Bible.
In the context of a “sex scandal,” it could imply a situation that involves sexual misconduct that is so widespread, shocking, or impactful that it could be compared to some of the dramatic narratives found in the Bible. The Bible has numerous stories, for example, King David and Bathsheba, that involve complex sexual relationships and misconduct.
Once upon a time, there was a powerful king named David. One day, while walking on the roof of his palace, he saw a beautiful woman named Bathsheba taking a bath. Despite having multiple wives, King David was captivated by Bathsheba and had an affair with her. When she became pregnant, David made it appear that the child was Uriah’s, Bathsheba’s husband. When Uriah didn’t cooperate, David arranged Uriah’s death in battle. After Uriah’s death, David married Bathsheba. They faced the consequences of their actions, but they also became the parents of Solomon, who grew up to be a wise king. Bathsheba, too, became a significant figure in the royal palace.
There is also King Herod Antipas, who divorced his wife and married Herodias, who was previously the wife of his brother Philip. John the Baptist, a well-known preacher of that time, publicly criticized this marriage because it was against Jewish law. This criticism angered Herodias, and she held a grudge against John. In the end, he was beheaded and his head was presented to Herodias.
After hearing Daniels’ version of her encounter or affair as she must have narrated? Her beautiful, charismatic personality blindsided Cohen? He then started to compare her narration with these biblical stories with long affairs/marriages? Like King David and Bathsheba? The mental picture of the sordid sexual affair between Trump and Daniels may have played in his mind to the extent that Trump is cheating on Melania or even replacing her with Daniels? He, the fixer, can save Trump from the biblical scandal of the century. Unfortunately, he did not see the major flaw in her story.
The Influence of Authority and Charisma
A charismatic narrator’s engaging style and compelling delivery can draw us in and make us more likely to accept their narrative.
The narrator plays a crucial role in shaping our perception of a story. A compelling narrator can make even the most implausible tales seem believable. Warhammer
The Power of Persuasion
Narrators often use persuasive techniques to make their stories more convincing. They may appeal to our emotions, use vivid imagery, or employ rhetorical devices. These techniques can make the narrative more engaging and compelling, increasing the likelihood that we will accept it without question.
Confirmation Bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one’s preexisting beliefs or hypotheses. Termsdepot
When we read or hear a story, we are more likely to accept the parts that align with our existing beliefs and ignore the parts that contradict them. This bias can lead us to believe stories without questioning their validity or fact-checking their claims. For example, if a person strongly believes in a particular political ideology, they are more likely to believe stories supporting it and dismiss those opposing it.
The Halo Effect is a cognitive bias in which our overall impression of a person influences how we feel and think about their character. Blackbelt thinking
It’s called the ‘halo effect’ because it’s as if a halo is shining on the person, making them appear positively. This can cause us to overestimate the credibility of a narrator based on a positive first impression. For instance, if a narrator is attractive, successful, or charismatic, we may automatically assume that they are trustworthy and knowledgeable, leading us to accept their narratives without question.
“Suspension of disbelief” is a term coined by the poet and aesthetic philosopher Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who suggested that if a writer could infuse a “human interest and a semblance of truth” into a fantastic tale, the reader would suspend judgment concerning the implausibility of the narrative. Wordlift
This willingness to suspend disbelief allows us to get lost in novels that involve magic, watch superhero movies that defy the laws of physics, or listen to ghost stories that chill our spines. The magic ink transforms words on a page into vivid, living worlds in our minds.
A skilled narrator can encourage this suspension of disbelief through various techniques. They can create relatable characters, weave intricate plots, use vivid descriptions, and employ dramatic irony. The more engrossed we become in the story, the more willing we are to accept the unbelievable elements of the narrative.
However, while suspension of disbelief enhances our enjoyment of stories, it also underscores the importance of critical thinking and fact-checking in our consumption of narratives, especially in non-fictional contexts. In an era where misinformation can spread rapidly, balancing our love for compelling narratives with a healthy dose of skepticism is crucial. We must remember to step back, question the plausibility of the information presented, and verify the facts before accepting them as truth.
Is this what happened to Cohen? When he met Beautiful, Charismatic Daniels? He wanted to impress Daniels?
He fell for her version hook, line, and sinker, thinking Trump would never be able to resist a beauty like Daniels? Did Cohen fall for her? Was he trying to impress her with his position with Trump, the future President of America?
He thought Trump was guilty of adultery. Did he use it for personal gain? To fill his own pockets? He issued an NDA, made Daniels sign, agreed to pay $130,000, and signed himself. Did Trump refuse to pay? He decided to pay from his pocket later and billed Trump $420,000. He hid the whole transaction from his wife so she did not know his continued dealings with Daniels. Or the money? Or the Shell company?
Cohen gave Daniels leverage!
In general, both parties to a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) must sign it for it to be legally binding. Sometimes, a client may explicitly authorize their lawyer to sign. Therefore, while it’s technically possible for a lawyer to sign an NDA on behalf of a client, it’s generally not recommended and could potentially lead to ethical and legal issues. American Bar Association
As a lawyer, Cohen must know that his signing the NDA is invalid. But still, he proceeds with it?
If Trump wanted an NDA from Daniels, he would have signed the document and paid for it himself, as he knows any document signed by his attorney without his consent is not valid, but he was forced to pay when Cohen produced the bill for $420,000.
Why will Trump pay for a significantly flawed script by Stormy Daniels?
Cohen saw an opportunity to make money and to continue his relationship with Daniels? Behind his wife’s back, portraying himself as the avert-er of a biblical sex scandal of the decade so indispensable to Trump as his savior?
Did it backfire?
Cohen created an NDA based on Stormy Daniels’ dressed up porn script without checking the basic facts? It is evident that it has major loopholes. Trump never had sex with her. Everything she narrates, including the bedroom scenes, is based on quicksand! Yet Cohen pays her $130,000, borrowing it from the bank.
Realizing his lawyer’s rogue behavior, a furious Trump decided to cut his losses with him? He did not invite him to join the White House team, to the great disappointment of Cohen. When presented with his bill, did he pay it as a subtle goodbye present? Was Cohen angry? He seems to have bided his time so when the opportunity to get back at Trump presented itself, he grabbed it with both hands. Vindicating his anger, blaming everything on Trump, he said he did everything on Trump’s instructions. When in reality, all signs point to him going rogue and abusing his influence and power by association. It looks like he was relying on Trump being too busy with other major events, which had to be prioritized first, to check on Cohen’s underhanded dealings.
Now Trump is in trouble due to Cohen’s rogue behavior during the time he was his lawyer.
