Extract from Daniels testimony:
‘When they met up later in his suite, she appreciated that he seemed interested in the business aspects of the industry rather than the “sexy stuff.” He also suggested putting her on his TV show, “The Apprentice,” a possibility she hoped could help establish her as a writer and director.
She left to use the bathroom and was startled to find Trump in his underwear sitting on the bed when she returned, she said. She didn’t feel physically or verbally threatened but realized that he was “bigger and blocking the way,” she testified.
“The next thing I know was: I was on the bed,” and they were having sex, Daniels recalled. The encounter was brief but left her “shaking,” she said. “I just wanted to leave,” she testified.
How come Daniels went to Trump’s bathroom, which is attached to the bedroom? And not to the bathroom attached to the living room?
Dinner was being served in the Living room of the suite?
Daniels wanted to use the facilities. Which bathroom did she use? As expected of the guest, she had to use the bathroom attached to the living room.
Is it possible Daniel went to the bathroom attached to the living room and was taking her time? Trump was tired of waiting for her to come out and decided to retire. (It is a well-known fact that some people take a long time in the bathroom.) He expected her to leave on her own. Daniels comes out, does not find Trump in the living room, goes to his bedroom, and finds him sitting on the bed about to retire. Daniels makes a move on Trump? Daniels’ version is that she had unprotected sex with Trump!
Trump having unprotected sex with a porn star? Or any woman other than his wife? Doubtful.. Irresponsibility is not one of Trump’s traits. He should be well aware of its consequences!
Did Trump rejects Daniels’ advances?
Hell hath no fury woman scorned?
The Unspoken Etiquette of Hotel Suite Bathrooms
A hotel suite symbolizes luxury and comfort, often chosen by those who wish to entertain guests or by hotels wanting to upgrade their essential patrons. A typical suite comprises a living room and one or more bedrooms, each equipped with its bathroom. However, some may only see an unspoken etiquette about using these bathrooms.
The living room is in a suite designed for socializing and entertaining and has a bathroom. This is not merely a design choice but a thoughtful provision for the comfort and privacy of the host and their guests. When guests need to use the facilities, they are expected to use the bathroom attached to the living room, not the personal bathroom of the host/hostess attached to the bedroom.
This practice stems from a respect for personal space and privacy. Just as one would not appreciate a guest using their personal bathroom at home, the same principle applies within the confines of a hotel suite. The individual bathroom attached to the bedroom is considered a private space reserved for the host.
If you find yourself as a guest in someone’s suite and need to use the bathroom, it’s considered polite to use the one in the living room. This respects the host’s privacy and avoids any potential discomfort. Similarly, if you’re hosting a meeting in your suite, guests should use the guest bathroom attached to the living room.
In conclusion, while hotel suites offer multiple bathrooms for convenience and comfort, it’s important to remember this simple rule of etiquette: the living room bathroom is for guests. In contrast, the bedroom bathroom is a private space for the host. This ensures a comfortable and respectful environment for all.
In court, determining the truth relies on evidence, not just verbal testimonies. This ensures fairness and justice. The “he said, she said” scenarios can be complex and challenging without concrete evidence or witnesses.
The use of different bathrooms in a suite is a great analogy. Just as the private bathroom is meant for specific individuals and the guest bathroom for visitors, evidence in court is used to delineate the truth from falsehoods. It’s a boundary that maintains the integrity of the process.
Respecting these boundaries, whether in a court of law or in personal spaces like a home or a hotel suite, is crucial for maintaining trust and respect.
Loophole in the script?
‘She became a pornographic actress in her early twenties, and, soon thereafter, became a screenwriter and director of adult films—a rarity for a woman at the time.
In 2002, she started performing in Wicked Pictures productions, becoming one of the studio’s contract stars, and later expanded her reach by writing and directing films for the company.’
New Yorker
Screen writer: Imaginative writing is a powerful tool that allows writers to create a world so vivid and believable that readers forget they’re reading a piece of fiction. By crafting detailed incidents and compelling narratives, writers can captivate their readers, immersing them in a world born from their imagination. This journey through the writer’s mind can evoke a wide range of emotions, create deep connections with characters, and leave lasting impressions. The ultimate goal is to blur the lines between fiction and reality, providing an immersive experience that transports readers into the heart of the story.
“Your career for over twenty years [was] writing, acting, and directing sex films, right?” Necheles asked. “So, you have a lot of experience in making phony stories about sex appear to be real, right?” Daniels appeared taken aback for a moment, but she recovered quickly. “Wow,” she said, with a slight laugh. “The sex in the films, it’s very much real. Just like what happened to me in that room.”
New Yorker
The loophole: According to her ‘he was on the bed when she came out‘? Trump was sitting on the bed when she emerged from the bathroom? Wasn’t she supposed to use the guest bathroom attached to the living room? Did the bed magically appear just outside the guest bathroom? These are the kind of puzzling inconsistencies that we sometimes encounter in a script, where the storyline has a flaw or loophole that the director may have overlooked, or perhaps was too busy or expensive to retake, hoping the audience wouldn’t notice.
Did Daniels, in her account about Trump, forget about the guest bathrooms attached to suites, which is a standard procedure for hotel suites? Did she base her account of events on a standard hotel room with an attached bathroom, as the majority of people rent standard rooms and not suites?
In the labyrinth of legal proceedings, the quest for truth often finds itself entangled in a web of words. The “he said, she said” scenarios, as they are colloquially known, present a unique challenge in pursuing justice.
The Intricacies of Verbal Testimonies
Words carry weight in a courtroom. They can tip the scales of justice, influence the verdict, and shape lives. However, determining the truth becomes a complex task when opposing testimonies clash. This is particularly true in cases with no witnesses, and the court must rely solely on the conflicting accounts of the involved parties.
The Role of Evidence
In such situations, evidence serves as the beacon of truth. It provides tangible proof that can substantiate or refute the parties’ claims. Evidence can be physical, digital, forensic, or circumstantial. Each piece of evidence is a puzzle, helping construct a clearer picture of the events in question.
The Importance of Boundaries
Boundaries are crucial in legal proceedings as in any other aspect of life. They delineate the line between truth and falsehood, ensuring the integrity of the process. Respecting these boundaries is not just a legal obligation but a moral one. It is a testament to the respect for the law, the court, and the pursuit of justice.
The Consequences of Crossing the Line
Crossing these boundaries by lying under oath, a crime known as perjury, carries severe consequences. It undermines the very foundation of the justice system, which relies on honesty and integrity. Perjury is a betrayal of the court and the truth itself.
Conclusion
Navigating the complexities of “he said, she said” courtroom scenarios is challenging. However, with the guiding light of the evidence and the precise boundaries the law sets, you can find the path to the truth. In the end, respect for these boundaries and the relentless pursuit of truth uphold the sanctity of justice.
Is Daniels lying under oath? Was the so-called sexual encounter between Trump and Daniel a fiction of her writer’s/screen director’s imagination? Is it revenge for being rejected? For not pursuing her sexually or romantically and not promoting her career? Is it just an opportunity to make money? Daniels portrays herself in “Full Disclosure” as a go-getter who goes to great lengths to make money. While narrating her account of events or her ‘script’, she forgot that the suite has multiple bathrooms, one for the living room and the other for the bedroom, and if she used the guest bathroom as she was his guest, miraculously, the bed does not appear when she came out of the bathroom.
‘He shall find no Fiend in Hell can match the fury of a disappointed Woman!’ This quote from Sir Novelty Fashion encapsulates the emotional intensity that can often be found in courtroom scenarios, particularly when a woman feels wronged.
