“Man who tried to have sex with my wife”! Husband’s Fantasy?
Photo by Gage Skidmore
Unraveling the Truth in Jane Doe’s Allegations
Accusations of sexual assault are serious and demand thorough investigation. When inconsistencies arise in the accuser’s account, it’s crucial to examine the details carefully. This article focuses on the text messages between Jane Doe and her husband, highlighting significant gaps and raising essential questions about the validity of her claims against Pete Hegseth.
The Alleged Incident and Text Messages:
Jane Doe met Pete Hegseth for the first time at conference and during that event, of which she was the event coordinator. There were multiple texts. In one she texted her (husband?) expressing that Pete Hegseth at the conference was giving “creeper” vibes. Women find him “dreamy“. There are several text messages reveal a conversation between them and in two of them her husband refers to Pete Hegseth as
“Oh you mean the man who tried to have sex with my wife? Not a good first impression for Pete.” at 8:29.
And a picture of Pete Hegseth addressing the conference,”
She describes him in her text: TBD and TDK besides he speaks well etc. despite there being no previous encounter between them and they met for the time that day!
“On 10-7-17. JANE DOE was busy with the conference. was in the hotel 209 room stated JANE DOE had gone to their hotel room 210 at approximately 1700 hours, while on a break. stated JANE DOE did 211 not seem intoxicated. JANE DOE had left the room and went back to work.
[…] stated JANE DOE was in communication with him, via text messages.
stated he fell asleep and woke up on 10-8-17, at approximately 00:00
hours. They texted some more and JANE DOE told him that she was at the bar
and out with the woman from the conference.
At approximately 0030 hours, JANE DOE stopped texting w a s worried about JANE DOE.
This text is confusing: ‘ this Pete dude is a TBD toooooo!
Him: Uh oh
Huw’s that?
I ll tell you about it when I get back hopefully soon
Holy smokes lady ? […]? I don’t remember the last time you were socializing at nearly 2:00am.”
Discrepancy in the Account:
Initial Meeting: Jane Doe met Pete Hegseth for the first time at the party. Her husband’s immediate reaction, referring to Pete Hegseth as someone who tried to have sex with his wife! Seems premature and raises questions about the context of their conversation? The text messages between Jane Doe and her husband suggest a preconceived notion about Pete’ Hegseth’s intentions, which may not align with the actual events at the party.
Questions Raised:
Preconceived Notions: Why did Jane Doe’s husband immediately assume that a Handsome Pete Hegseth who met his beautiful, young wife (30 years) few hours earlier along with many other guests immediately focused on his wife and tried to have sex with her? Is this a porn scene scenario possibly directed by Stormy Daniels: ‘powerful man meets beautiful young female and wants to bed her immediately, in spite of all the audience waiting in line to meet him?’ Like Stormy Daniels’ story with one major loophole which has been overlooked where it clearly indicates Trump never bedded her except in her dreams? ‘She goes to bathroom, comes out and Trump is on the bed ready to bed her and does not let her leave the bedroom ‘ The one Cohen fell for? Forgetting Trump did not entertain her in a seedy hotel room, but in a five star resort 1200 square feet deluxe suite which has a separate bathroom in the living room and a bathroom in the bedroom. Guest are supposed to use bathroom of the living room, not the hosts personal bathroom in the bedroom?
So how did the bed magically appear when she came out of the bathroom in front of her in the living room?
Her whole testimony is based on her imagination and skill as a story teller, script writer and director of porn films. Her so called steamy affair came down to one night when he entertained her in his suit and never bedded her!!! She let her fantasy grow? Trump never bedded her but in her imagination! Cohen fell for it or head over heels for her? He was boasting that he was averting biblical scandal. He pays her from his own pocket without consulting Trump as he was busy with elections, then later submits his bill and got Trump in massive problems instead?
Or Jean Caroll’s scenario: Trump bumps into Caroll at the entrance of Bergdorf’s for women only store. Then galavants with her all the way to lingerie department, pushes her into one of the changing rooms, which were not locked as per store policy. The attendant of the changing room conveniently forgot, forgetting it is only opened at clients’ request? He then rapes her while she is screaming? Nobody hears the screaming? During Rush season? Customers are queuing to try the lingeries! She kept the dress she was wearing as his DNA (DNA is transferable) was on it as a memento but conveniently forgets about keeping her panties? Supposing she was wearing them? During the end of the year and/or early in the mid nineties on Thursday evening? That was rush hour for shoppers, especially working women. Forgetting in the early 90 ‘s due to Anita Hill a law was passed by Bush and women started suing men so men were often scared to enter a lift alone with a woman because they might be sued? It is one of the major reasons Bergdorf had split into separate stores for women and men. It was a short walking distance between stores. The changing rooms were always locked guarded by changing room attendants. Because of thieves, there was CCTV on all floors along with security. Also, the end of the year due to holidays, festivals and beginning of the year SALE was RUSH SEASON!
She threw away her stockings with Trump’s sperm? Because she was traumatized, but she then kept the dress intact and unwashed safely? There is no mention of panties. Why does she never mention panties?
There was no sperm on her dress?
Then already a celebrity, Trump was stupid enough? or entirely BRAIN DEAD for this? He does not know that there are CCTV cameras, personal shoppers who approach you, that it was Rush shopping season? If Caroll’s scenario had happened, there would have been headlines the next day across the Atlantic and Bergdorf would have faced multiple lawsuits from other shoppers. A sexual assault in the changing room? Trump would have been exposed to black mail, etc.? Trump is so naive, so totally unaware of these repercussions?
At that time Macy’s were having problem under chapter 11, deserted shops and deserted changing rooms with a skeleton staff who were not interested. Was she describing Macy’s layout and did she have sex with a gentleman in their deserted changing room?
You can fantasize about having sex with anyone?
The Trump name sells. She is an author who got fame, money, etc. In fact, if she had said who really it was, maybe an obscure man, would there have been any demand for her writing, etc.?
For easy money?
Or Megyn Kelly’s one question.
During the 2016 presidential debate Megyn Kelly asks him a question.
Kelly said to Trump, “You once told a contestant on ‘Celebrity Apprentice’ it would be a pretty picture to see her on her knees. Does that sound to you like the temperament of a man we should elect as president?”
Contestant Bret Michaels comments to the judges how his fellow colleague Brande Roderick dropped to her knees when pleading with her team to select her as Project Manager!
Trump: “Excuse me, you DROPPED to your knees?”
Brande: “Yes.”
Trump: “It must be a pretty picture, you dropping to your knees.”
You can see the innuendo Megyn Kelly was insinuating based on a 15-SECOND conversation out of 253 HOURS or 15,180 MINUTES!
Neither Trump nor Roderick remembered.
How deep did Kelly have to dig even to get that 15 seconds from Trump’s life, which has been an open book all his life!!
The sentence is documented, and the media twists its meaning while questioning Trump. Nobody bothered to check the facts.
The next day, Trump was labeled as a sexist, women hater, etc. in every major newspaper.
Pandora’s box opened with a series of accusations of sexual assaults presumably done by Trump. The lawsuits, if you dig deep enough, you will find lacking factual evidence! And he is still facing them!
Now both Jane Doe and her husband’s assumption that Pete Hegseth tried to have sex with her seems to be based on limited interaction and raises questions about the context and accuracy of their conversation. Is it entirely based on their fantasy world?
Is it an Ego Boost? Some men might take pride in the idea that their partner is desired by powerful men, seeing it as an ego boost. However, this dynamic can complicate the interpretation of the text messages and the overall situation.
Implications:
Credibility of the Accusation: The text messages and the husband’s immediate assumption about Pete Hegseth’s intentions raise questions about the credibility of Jane Doe’s account. It suggests that there may be more to the story?
Need for Thorough Investigation: These inconsistencies highlight the importance of a thorough investigation. It’s essential to gather all relevant evidence and examine the details carefully to ensure a fair and accurate assessment of the situation.
Conclusion:
The text messages between Jane Doe and her husband raise important questions about the validity of her claims against Pete Hegseth. The immediate assumption about Pete’s intentions and the context of text message between Doe and her husband suggest significant gaps in the narrative. Why was she keen to imply that Pete Hegseth tried to have sex with her ? Why does her husband refer to him as ‘the man who tried to have sex with my wife’? Was she boasting about herself to her husband that ‘the powerful, prominent man wants her’? It’s crucial to approach such cases with a critical eye, ensuring that all parties receive fair treatment and that the investigation is thorough and unbiased.
The sad fact is that you need a very sharp lawyer who really fights for you and an unbiased judge, unlike Trump’s experience? Pete Hegseth would rather face the wrath of the public and lose a job? Did he see settling as the only option?
